The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory

The Sexual Politics of Meat A Feminist Vegetarian Critical Theory The Sexual Politics of Meat argues that what or precisely who we eat is determined by the patriarchal politics of our culture and that the meanings attached to meat eating are often clustered aroun

  • Title: The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory
  • Author: Carol J. Adams
  • ISBN: 9780826404558
  • Page: 231
  • Format: Hardcover
  • The Sexual Politics of Meat argues that what, or precisely who, we eat is determined by the patriarchal politics of our culture, and that the meanings attached to meat eating are often clustered around virility.Sales PointsThe 20th Anniversary Edition of this cult classic a book that has changed the lives of thousands of women A bible of the vegan community the NThe Sexual Politics of Meat argues that what, or precisely who, we eat is determined by the patriarchal politics of our culture, and that the meanings attached to meat eating are often clustered around virility.Sales PointsThe 20th Anniversary Edition of this cult classic a book that has changed the lives of thousands of women A bible of the vegan community the New York Times.This book includes a brand new preface by the author, examining how society s attitudes have changed and how they haven t over the last two decades.DescriptionFirst published in 1990, The Sexual Politics of Meat is a landmark text in the ongoing debates about animal rights In the two decades since, the book has inspired controversy and heated debate.The Sexual Politics of Meat argues that what, or precisely who, we eat is determined by the patriarchal politics of our culture, and that the meanings attached to meat eating are often clustered around virility We live in a world in which men still have considerable power over women, both in public and in private Carol Adams argues that gender politics is inextricably related to how we view animals, especially animals who are consumed And she argues too that vegetarianism and fighting for animal rights fit perfectly alongside working to improve the lives of disenfranchised and suffering people, under the wide umbrella of compassionate activism.This 20th Anniversary Edition includes a new preface by the author, discussing new developments in the field and answering some of her critics If you ve never read The Sexual Politics of Meat, prepare to have your worldview challenged and possibly turned upside down liketens of thousands of readers before you.

    • [PDF] Å Free Download ✓ The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory : by Carol J. Adams ↠
      231 Carol J. Adams
    • thumbnail Title: [PDF] Å Free Download ✓ The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory : by Carol J. Adams ↠
      Posted by:Carol J. Adams
      Published :2019-02-12T05:54:20+00:00

    About “Carol J. Adams

    • Carol J. Adams

      Carol J Adams is a feminist vegetarian theorist and author of books on eco feminism and the links between species oppression and gender oppression.

    741 thoughts on “The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory

    • Recently my adult English class were studying the topic of 'nature' which had a section on 'animals'. One of the opinions on the page was something along the lines of 'the world would be a healthier and happier place if everyone went vegetarian and it would be good for the environment too'. After giving time for students to discuss this and other ideas, I asked if they agreed with it and was answered by a chorus of heartfelt 'no!'s. Why not, I wanted to hear, and the students vehemently insisted [...]


    • let me preface this review by saying that carol adams is a true pioneer in the field of eco/vegetarian-feminist critical theory. she sheds light on how systems of oppression intersect with one another and how capitalism, patriarchy, racism and classism converge and are expressed in the oppression and exploitation of animals. i think this is a seminal work in the field and warrants thoughtful reading. it provides an alternative critique of capitalist and patriarchal systems of oppression and is a [...]


    • How could I resist a title like this? This is supposed to be a classic, whatever that means. And I really came at this book wanting to like it, being a vegetarian feminist that's long wished for ANY critical theory that I don't consider to be a massive inward-looking circle jerk. But unfortunately it is quite bonkers. There are some basic points I was on board with. There are some interesting ways that women and meat are connected by "da patriarchy": meat eating is associated with strength and v [...]


    • This book opened my eyes to a fundamental concept that I feel is lacking in most of discussions of most of the subjects we discuss, societally speaking: the absent referent. Sure, this book draws parallels between culture's attitude and treatment of animals and its treatment and attitude toward women, but it goes further with regard to the former. It posits that the reason it's so easy for us to abuse, misuse, mistreat, and [whatever] animals the way we do, is that, linguistically, we strip our [...]


    • The New York Times runs an essay contest on the ethics of meat eating. The judges are animal rights advocates and plant-based nutrition gurus. They are all men.Carol J. Adams wrote "The Sexual Politics of Ethics" and questioned the choice of an all male panel. Why wasn't a single female included (Karen Davis, Pattrice Jones, Lauren Ornelas, Erica Meier, Josephine Donovan, Greta Gaard, Lori Gruen, Marla Rose, Laura Wright, Kim Socha, Breeze Harper, Jasmin Singer or Mariann Sullivan for example)?W [...]


    • It’s hard not to feel ambivalent – strongly ambivalent – about this book.Unless you’re a student, or teacher, of feminist literature, it is somewhat of a slog to get through this book. “The Sexual Politics of Meat” is mainly an analysis of feminist literature and most of the works to which Adams refers will seem obscure to the average reader.On the other hand, this book is considered a classic in the veg*n genre and for good reason. Adams artfully conveys a number of important ideas, [...]


    • Look, this book was OK. The things that make me not consider it to be a better work, was the cissexism and transphobia throughout the piece. It turns out Adams' mentor was Mary Daly, notorious for not just her radical feminism, but her extreme transphobia.The most blatant (and simple) demonstration of Adams' prejudice was her treatment of Doctor James Barry. When Dr. Barry died, it was discovered that he was apparently born female. Once she reveals this of Barry, Adams proceeds to repeatedly ref [...]


    • I don’t know whether it was the style or some other nebulous reason, but I found this book difficult to read. It was well worth the effort, though, because the author presents an important hypothesis about the correlation between the ways women and animals are treated and regarded in society. I found this book to be unique, as some of the information and ideas it presents I’ve found in no other books.


    • **THIS IS A LONG REVIEW. So you know where I'm coming from, I'm first going to explain what made me decide to be vegan. If you don't care, the book review will commence after some asterisks. But not these ones -->** One warm autumn night in Los Angeles, I had a dream. I was on a lunch date with my mom and an old friend at a nice Chinese restaurant I’ve never been to before. The walls and décor were dark, red, paper lanterns and dragons on the walls. It was busy, and we could barely hear th [...]


    • “Our dietary choices reflect and reinforce our cosmology, our politics.”This sentence, the third-to-last sentence in The Sexual Politics of Meat, nicely summarizes Carol Adams’s basic thesis in this book wherein she ties together her feminist critique of patriarchy with her vegetarian critique of patriarchy. These two social critiques, argues Adams, are not merely related but are part of an organic whole: to live fully the feminist protest against the heterosexual male oppressiveness of pa [...]


    • it has a tendency to be a tad one note in truth the author really has two main points to get across to the reader but she milks (ha ha! food analogy!) the material well. of interest are her sections on language and animal metaphors as they are employed to describe meat dishes (hero sandwiches, etc) as well as in how victims of sexual violence describe themselves ("i was a piece of meat") the author navigates the theoretical aspects of this discussion reasonably wellus far my only real complaints [...]


    • Amazing book. This academic text read like a thriller for me, as each page turned up new insights. It looks at how patriarchal society treats women and nonhuman animals as objects and how if one wants to overturn patriarchy, one must give up meat because it is part of patriarchal power.


    • I'm conflicted. On the one hand, I feel like the arguments are sometimes circular, the writing isn't fabulous, and I had a hard time getting through such a theoretical book. I admit that I skimmed the last half because I had already discussed it at book group and I was getting a bit bogged down in the repetition.But. This book has probably given me more pause than anything I've read in a while, simply because she makes some interesting arguments that, while not the main thesis of the book, are r [...]


    • I'd read part of this for a previous class; read the whole thing this time, and am glad I did. It's both wonderful and awful. First the bad: bad use of theory, bad readings of literature, writing that lacks nuance, extremely polemical. But, at certain points the key argument really sings through, namely that feminism and vegetarianism both are anti-patriarchal and are inherently tied to one another. She also tries to re-establish a feminist-vegetarian literary and cultural history, which is admi [...]


    • Ok, I'm not sure where to start with this review. I guess I'll start by first saying that I had read this book in great part already, but wanted to read it thoroughly again in order to get it fresh in my mind as I often felt like recommending it to some people when they were failing to see connections between woman and animal exploitation. I still think that this book can be a great eye-opener for some people, but reading it again now left me dissatisfied.I was mostly annoyed by the writing styl [...]


    • I initially read the intro chapter to this book back in 2003 when I was taking an EcoFeminism class at university. I was a new vegetarian, and many of the things that Carol J Adams mentioned in that chapter stayed with me over the years to the point when I saw her tweet something about the book, I decided that I had to go back to this text. It's been years, and now I'm a vegan and it's still just as - if not more - relevant to me. Adams does several things with this book. She makes you really re [...]


    • In this book, Carol Adams argues the intersection of feminist and vegetarian theory. She successfully demonstrates a connect between meat and power. There is also an interesting discussion of the use of language surrounding meat and vegetables ("beef up," "feel like a piece of meat," "a vegetative state"). I found her most compelling argument to be that people who claim to oppose war/are non-violent should also espouse that behavior in their food choices. Near the end of the book Adams raises so [...]


    • Parts of this book shine, and Adams really hits the nail on the head when she explains why veg*ns can get so offended by omnivores who call themselves vegetarians. However, I think the title is misleading. Adams starts out with much promise, showing the links between advertising meat and women for consumption, but quickly falls into literary critiques and leaves a lot of the politics and sociology behind.This book is much better suited to viewing literature, rather than life, from a feminist and [...]


    • "[T]he phrase 'humane slaughter' confers a certain benignity on the term 'slaughter.' [Mary] Daly would call this process of 'simple inversion': 'the usage of terms and phrases to label activites as the opposite of what they are.' [] Just as all rapes are forcible, all slaughter of animals for food is inhumane regardless of what it is called" (69-70).Most compelling are Carol J. Adams' deconstructions of language. Adams' literary examinations of vegetarianism and feminism are least interesting, [...]


    • Different than I expected, but still so interesting. Adams links up the oppression of women and the oppression of animals, and explores the way that women's and animal's bodies have been dismembered and consumed by patriarchal systems. This book gave me a lot to chew on (ha! pun!), and I'm still digesting the ideas (ha! ha!)


    • This was the first book I bought the week I decided to be a vegetarian. I found it in a new agey store in Sedona, Arizona. It's an important book. It helped me understand omnivore aggression toward vegetarians at the table, which can be a baffling experience. This is good read for new vegetarians with an academic bent. It is actually a little painfully graphic to me now.


    • A very interesting, slightly weird philosophy of how the meat industry and the opression of women are linked. Discusses the history of food, and how the vocabulary of meat is also used as nicknames for women. Slightly crazy, but very interesting and highly recommended if you are open minded.


    • This is one of the most amazing books written about how our society, through the culture and nature of patriarchy chews up and spits out women and animals. It's a brilliant book and one every animal rights advocate and feminist should read.


    • This book was a cornerstone in my growth as a woman,a vegetarian and as a social liberal. Carol Adams' thorough examination of how these issues are linked is fascinating and compelling.



    • This book raised a lot of interesting ideas, but ultimately, the lack of structure and heavy focus on literary criticism detracted from its fundamental premise that feminists should want to be vegan.First, Adams argues that discourse about meat is gendered. Definitely true, no questions here. However, the fact that meat-eating is gendered by Western societies does not fundamentally resolve the question of whether to eat meat or not.Second, Adams argues that feminism and vegetarianism are intertw [...]


    • Super interesting read. I'm going to be thinking about this one for a while. Things this book made me think about: "moral" vegetarianism and veganism, relationship with the historical vegetarian movement, dealing with "problematic" institutions and the politics of veg*nism. I'll just talk briefly about each. I define "moral" vegetarianism or veganism to be the belief that it is wrong to kill (respectively use) animals for human pleasure or convenience. This is as opposed to "tentative" vegetaria [...]


    • i agree w carol j adams that vegetarianism & the oppression of animals can/should be an ethical choice that has bearing on feminist politics, and there are a lot of kernels of interest interspersed throughout the sexual politics of meat, but i can't fucking stand her positioning of women & animals as similar oppressed beings. somewhere in the deep recesses of her blog, in a completely different but applicable context, she makes the point of saying that feminists do not make that comparis [...]


    • Okay, I get it. I'm glad that I read this. Feminism is related to vegetarianism. Here's a good quote: "Feminist-vegetarian activity declares that an alternative worldview exists, one which celebrates life rather than consuming death; one which does not rely on resurrected animals but empowered people."However, the theory is literary, which is usually fine but impractical here. The quotes sometimes feel weird and misplaced. I'd've preferred a book that focused solely on the historical relationshi [...]


    • I thought she made some interesting points until I talked to my husband (who worked at dairies and slaughtered chickens, etc. as a teenager) who grew up in a farming community. There were a lot of "assumptions" made. For instance she claims that female animals are extorted because of milk and eggs which have to do with female reproduction. Then my husband explained how many male cows become steers because the rancher chooses a few males with desirable traits to mate with the cows (bulls), and th [...]


    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *